Comments on: Should TechCrunch Have Published Internal Twitter Documents http://www.timetotweet.com/should-techcrunch-have-published-internal-twitter-documents/ The home of Twitter Addicts | From Twitterscripts.net Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:37:22 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: phixjutu http://www.timetotweet.com/should-techcrunch-have-published-internal-twitter-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-17790 phixjutu Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:37:22 +0000 http://www.timetotweet.com/?p=723#comment-17790 IZS7Jq <a href="http://ifvjoytbczsx.com/" rel="nofollow">ifvjoytbczsx</a> IZS7Jq ifvjoytbczsx

]]> By: Merertu http://www.timetotweet.com/should-techcrunch-have-published-internal-twitter-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-17772 Merertu Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:56:05 +0000 http://www.timetotweet.com/?p=723#comment-17772 Dear Laura, I am gttieng the same message, it has been like this for the past two days. I see that you posted this today, so I am guessing I am not the only one, it must be system wide. Dear Laura, I am gttieng the same message, it has been like this for the past two days. I see that you posted this today, so I am guessing I am not the only one, it must be system wide.

]]> By: Roseli A. Bakar http://www.timetotweet.com/should-techcrunch-have-published-internal-twitter-documents/comment-page-1/#comment-260 Roseli A. Bakar Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:56:36 +0000 http://www.timetotweet.com/?p=723#comment-260 Even though they (TechCrunch) did not steal the documents, they should not make it public. All they have to do is to get Twitter to confirm that they have the documents to prove to the non-believers. After all they are doing this for publicity only... why the need to make it public ?? Even though they (TechCrunch) did not steal the documents, they should not make it public.

All they have to do is to get Twitter to confirm that they have the documents to prove to the non-believers.

After all they are doing this for publicity only… why the need to make it public ??

]]>